The name exists for a reason.

Van Dickk's shoulder into Gordon's face. If it had been an elbow, he would have been off and it would have been a pen (Wright and Keane's opinion but correct, imo)-what difference should the fact that it was a deliberate shoulder rather than an elbow into his face have made?

The Isak pen...clear trip in the box. Ref was shite at best, corrupt at worst. VAR had no excuse-just corrupt.

The Ref blowing up when we had a three on one. Is anyone in any doubt that, if the roles had been reversed, the Ref would have let that final passage of play play out?

This isn't even sour grapes. I'm delighted with a point against the best team in the league, and possibly in Europe. Butyou want it to be a level playing field...and it just isn't.

I know it all sounds like a conspiracy theory seen through a black and white lens but, if you subscribe to the view that there is a cartel which is stopping clubs like ourselves and Villa from competing with them (and the evidence for that being the case is compelling), is it too much of a stretch to believe that the cartel have the refs in their pocket?

Personally, I don't have any trouble believing it.