Sheff Utd tonight

[kritichris]

got stuffed by Hull despite "statistically" dominating the game. Good result for us though, should inspire us to beat Leeds.

[alfinyalcabo]

What a great result for us Chris,well done Hull.Bet Wilder will be fuming and coming out with all sorts of schite to the Sky interview team 👏

[ClaretinBudapest]

Mauled by the Tigers.Great result for us.

[army88]

got stuffed by Hull despite "statistically" dominating the game. Good result for us though, should inspire us to beat Leeds.

The times I?ve watched hull they?re not a mile away from being a decent side - makes you wonder if they kept Rossenior and stuck with him if he could have taken them in again

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Wilder will be going nuts, they had a perfectly good goal ruled offside.

[ballcock]

They go out in the January transfer window and load themselves up with strikers, when it's obvious they need defenders

I think United due to their defensive frailties will slip away now, making a 3 way shoot out between us Leeds and Sunderland

We just need to carry on in the way we have in keeping it tight at the back, and we will ok

[outwoodclaret]

Wilder will be going nuts, they had a perfectly good goal ruled offside.

Don’t you just love the Championship. No f**king VAR.

[Supersub6]

Wilder will be going nuts, they had a perfectly good goal ruled offside.

Campbell was possibly marginally offside when the first ball was played through and he headed it. The camera angle which was shown was nowhere near in line so it was a decision made by the lino which is the way it should be. Had Campbell missed the header and the ball continued in the same path it is possible that the Blades would still have scored and it would have been allowed. That's football without interference, I love it.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Campbell was possibly marginally offside when the first ball was played through and he headed it. The camera angle which was shown was nowhere near in line so it was a decision made by the lino which is the way it should be. Had Campbell missed the header and the ball continued in the same path it is possible that the Blades would still have scored and it would have been allowed. That's football without interference, I love it.

I do when it goes our way mein freund but I'm still trying to understand how the Pilgrims centre-back handled the ball on THREE separate occasions and not ONE penalty was awarded to the Clarets.

I'm wondering if the bungs are getting bigger.

[Supersub6]

I do when it goes our way mein freund but I'm still trying to understand how the Pilgrims centre-back handled the ball on THREE separate occasions and not ONE penalty was awarded to the Clarets.

I'm wondering if the bungs are getting bigger.

I envy you BT, because you actually know what constitutes handball these days. I have to admit that, in spite of playing the game at semi-pro level and refereeing at the same level and mentoring young referees for years, I am at a total loss to know what constitutes handball because they have messed about with the Law and its interpretation so much that I have just given up on it.