+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Marinakis no longer in charge of Forest

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    1,957

    Marinakis no longer in charge of Forest

    https://www.skysports.com/football/n...emain-as-owner

    Of course if you believe it then you're dumber than a very dumb thing.

    Which i suspect Uefa are as it makes a mockery of their rules.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    14,444
    Quote Originally Posted by SithHappens View Post
    https://www.skysports.com/football/n...emain-as-owner

    Of course if you believe it then you're dumber than a very dumb thing.

    Which i suspect Uefa are as it makes a mockery of their rules.
    Tbh, Sith…this seems to expose the stupidity of the rules regarding multi club ownership than any wrongdoing on the fat man’s part.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    1,957
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    Tbh, Sith…this seems to expose the stupidity of the rules regarding multi club ownership than any wrongdoing on the fat man’s part.
    Yeah that's pretty much my view. I don't blame him to be honest.

    I guess I'm of the view if olympiakos or forest were playing each other in the last game of the 1st round and a certain result was needed for one or both then you know it will happen. Uefas fault though.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,827
    Quote Originally Posted by sithhappens View Post
    https://www.skysports.com/football/n...emain-as-owner

    of course if you believe it then you're dumber than a red dog tree hugger.

    which i suspect uefa are as it makes a mockery of their rules.
    fify.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,600
    Quote Originally Posted by SithHappens View Post
    https://www.skysports.com/football/n...emain-as-owner

    Of course if you believe it then you're dumber than a very dumb thing.

    Which i suspect Uefa are as it makes a mockery of their rules.
    Garbage, he isn't on his own.
    If he turns the club over to be run by someone else, so what?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    1,957
    Looking less likely it matters now anyway

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,827
    Just read this elsewhere on socials and it raised a smile.

    I like the moment they cut to their fat chairman slumped across 2 seats with grease marks all down his marquee, sorry, shirt.

    I also realised that their supporters don't understand football, presumably due to their mental incapacity. Every time a f*rest player goes down in the box, they scream for a penalty, regardless of why they went down. At one point Dewsbury Hall cleared the ball and 2 f*rest players kicked him, banged into each other and fell over. Cut straight to a six finger knuckle dragger in the crowd screaming at the ref that it was a clear penalty.

    We may be a long way behind them on the pitch but I'm just pleased I'm not one of them.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    7,503
    I did like that they banned Gary Neville from the ground yesterday. If a few more clubs did that life would be much better for Sky subsctibers

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    14,444
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
    I did like that they banned Gary Neville from the ground yesterday. If a few more clubs did that life would be much better for Sky subsctibers
    Lol. You might find it superficially amusing, GP, as might I, but it’s a ridiculous precedent and all too typical (over) reaction, imo, to ban a pundit because you don’ t like their criticism.

    Almost guarantees a home draw for Forest against Salford in one of next season’s cup competitions.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,885
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
    I did like that they banned Gary Neville from the ground yesterday. If a few more clubs did that life would be much better for Sky subsctibers
    Why would making life for Sky subscribers be a plus? Isn't the money from Sky thats inflated footballers wages and resulted n games being arranged for Sky Tv's convenience and scheduling rather than fans a negative?

    As RA rightly points out, banning journalists or media from anywhere on the basis of you don't like them or what they say (echoes of Trump here) then that's a negative for free speech and a dangerous precedent.

    I thought you were making the argument on here that all views should be heard and not cancelled?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •