I don't wish to exemp the team and managements for an abject season for many performances that have been below expectation.
However if we look at a number of instances of where bad (incompetent or corrupt?) refereeing decisions have cost us:
Dundee Utd A: Ojo sent off for not hitting a supporter (despite a hun not being sent off for actually hitting a supporter at Hibs) where we were likely to win. 3 points lost.
Scum A: referees supervisor accepts that 2 erroneous decisions cost us 2 goals. 3 points lost.
Scum H: Keeper not sent off for attrocious tackle. Penalty not awarded and keeper stays on. Likely 2 points lost.
Lavvy H: As scum H game. Likely 3 points lost.
All in all 11 points we could/ should have had.
As said, not to excuse some poor performances resulting in a poor season but those 11 points would have made a huge difference. Cancels out over a season my backside (being polite).
Point out if my memory is failing me or if bad decisions in our favour balance.
The SFA need to look at this viz a viz refereeing incompetence/ corruption. Bad referees need to be demoted even if that means bringing in non Scots to cover until we have a competent system for referee training (elimination of bias).