How many of you actually believe that the ONLY reason you lost that game was the referee and his decisions?
No wishy washy "might have beens" etc- how many people think that the only, single reason you lost was the referee?
How many of you actually believe that the ONLY reason you lost that game was the referee and his decisions?
No wishy washy "might have beens" etc- how many people think that the only, single reason you lost was the referee?
Therefore I slightly amend.
How many of you believe that the ONLY reason you lost was the officiating?
thats fine
Just interested to see what the consensus is amongst you
I think it played a major part, if we'd left the Ricoh with a 0-1, had our second goal stood, we'd have actually been in front in the tie.
The fact that the goal wasn't given, changed the dynamic, Cov then scored a third which was offside twice in the same move.
We can't say that it was the only reason but the officiating was an absolute, major contributor to the result, any neutral would surely accept that?
I don't, I believe there were THREE reasons we lost the game.
1. Wrong decision by ref to award you a penalty at your place.
2. Wrong decision by JS side lino to rule out the Forte 'goal'.
3. Wrong decision by DP side lino to allow your third goal.
Correct decisions would have meant a 3-3 aggregate. You can't lose 3-3. After that it's unfortunately back to wishy washy "might have beens". Either side could have gone on to win.