For 4 games due to gay comments on Twitter 4 yrs ago.
Surely that's the past and he hasn't done it since so why has it come to light now and deserves a punishment?
Internet trolls will now have a field day looking back to the past comments![]()
|
| + Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
For 4 games due to gay comments on Twitter 4 yrs ago.
Surely that's the past and he hasn't done it since so why has it come to light now and deserves a punishment?
Internet trolls will now have a field day looking back to the past comments![]()
Seems a ridiculous decision seen as though its 4 years ago when he was playing for Luton but Burnley are the ones getting punished for it, i very much doubt if he was playing for Man Utd, Man City or Liverpool ect nothing would have been done but because its little Burnley they will want them out the Premier League like the Football League wants us out of the championship.
Some of these decisions take a bit of understanding when it's the current club that suffers for an earlier misdemeanour.
It's a bit like when Steve Evans got a stadium ban from NYS for an "indiscretion" he committed at Bradford when he was manager of Crawley.
You have to wonder if the football authorities think these things through.
Just maybe they're trying to punish the players rather than the clubs?
What I mean is... the player himself isn't allowed to play, which is his punishment - the person the punishment is targeted at.
The clubs are collateral damage.
Its like saying someone shouldn't be sent to prison because of the damage it will do to the kids. They're not trying to punish the kids.
What does a ban actually mean? In the NFL it means no pay, no training with the team, no attendance at games and strictly no speaking to anyone at the club.