It seems we tried to vote no, sent a no vote in they didn’t get.
Why on earth don’t we just resend our no vote?
|
| + Visit Dundee FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
It seems we tried to vote no, sent a no vote in they didn’t get.
Why on earth don’t we just resend our no vote?
agree that would be the sensible thing to do,i notice that the follow follow forum are in full flow,i think someone is going to pay,what i dont get is whether we voted or not then result would not change.they seem to be pointing fingers at doncaster and lawell and us
Last edited by shaded; 11-04-2020 at 08:52 PM.
Disappointed with the Football Clubs response this afternoon - hope they can justify it. If there is good reason for not lodging their vote ‘in good time’ nor putting right any misunderstanding then I look forward to hearing it. In this time of trouble, strife and suffering I have to say the current position of our Club just looks plain stupid. If there is good reason, let’s hear it.
Yes - of no comment - confirmed for me they heard what was being said. Surely no excuse H for as you say not voting in good time or putting right any misunderstanding. Cannot see what they hope to gain from their current position but happy to be proved wrong.
obviously someone is trying to make the club change their vote
Prolly Lawell desperate for 9 in a row
or we could be the whistleblower and in a good position to change the league setup
or is Bennett in the club's ear
would it not have been easier re sending then putting forward a counter proposal?
im sure partick would have been thinking that,however now that 1 half of weegieville have their teeth into the situation it will no doubt come out in the wash,
a big big thing on the radio was that several clubs felt threatened 1 of which likened it to having a gun held at their head
what annoys me most is some clubs voted to "get the money" before doing what was right for football,you cant relegate a team with the points so close,not often iv agreed wi spoofer however his and ict's views on this point were correct