+ Visit Carlisle United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Who do you want to be in charge of CUOSC?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    623

    Who do you want to be in charge of CUOSC?

    a) The current board
    b) The folk organising Unita Fortior (thecumbrians.net moderators)
    c) Another bunch of folk from the Unita Fortior incoming membership
    d)Name:  davros-and-himmler-with-the-first-ever-daleks-genesis-of-the-daleks-doctor-who-back-when.jpg
Views: 166
Size:  80.0 KB
    e) None Of The Above

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,670
    Quote Originally Posted by 6EQUJ5 View Post
    a) The current board
    b) The folk organising Unita Fortior (thecumbrians.net moderators)
    c) Another bunch of folk from the Unita Fortior incoming membership
    d)Name:  davros-and-himmler-with-the-first-ever-daleks-genesis-of-the-daleks-doctor-who-back-when.jpg
Views: 166
Size:  80.0 KB
    e) None Of The Above
    Ultimately it will be fairly irrelevant when the club goes into administration.

    The question then will be who has the money and desire to buy us out of administration and fund what will probably still be a loss making business even without the EWM debt.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    21,411
    £84k each year in interest on a debt of around £2.4m. What’s that, 3.5% compounding? About right but it’s more cement holding the current three in place. Day knows where he’s got them.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,600
    Holdings is just a bucket containing the 1921 shares.
    I do not see any possibility of 1921 going into administration because it is not in the interests of any of the stakeholders. Only they can put 1921 into administration.
    1921 can go insolvent, out of business and cease to exist. Administration is just a station that can be stopped at on the way to insolvency but it is not in the interests of any of the stakeholders to initiate such a stop.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,670
    Quote Originally Posted by _Stefan_Kuntz View Post
    Holdings is just a bucket containing the 1921 shares.
    I do not see any possibility of 1921 going into administration because it is not in the interests of any of the stakeholders. Only they can put 1921 into administration.
    1921 can go insolvent, out of business and cease to exist. Administration is just a station that can be stopped at on the way to insolvency but it is not in the interests of any of the stakeholders to initiate such a stop.
    If Philip Day has no interest in acquiring the Club then it would seem logical that, at some stage, he will want his money back.

    In the short term maybe he has been led to believe that there is a chance of this being achieved by income from a sale of Dean Henderson or some other "football fortune".

    However if this doesn't happen and at any stage thereafter the Club is unable to comply with the terms of the loan agreement, PD would be entirely within his rights to serve formal demand against both the Club and the Guarantors.

    If, at that stage, neither the Club nor the Guarantors were in a position to repay the loan (and outstanding interest) PD would have the option to take legal action against either the Club, the Guarantors or both.

    If there is any perceived value in the Club (e.g. a potential buyer of the assets and goodwill waiting in the wings) PD could use his debenture to appoint an administrative receiver with powers to run the Club and sell the assets.

    If that happens the CUOSC shareholding becomes worthless.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5,180
    I thought the debt was with EWM and not Day. How does that affect the loan - does Day have any say?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,600
    The debt was with EWM Limited, which was one of the companies of EWM Group. The debt is now with Purepay Retail Limited, which I think is not part of the restructured EWM Group. PD is not a director of Purepay Retail Limited and he does not own any of its shares. However, he controls it by means of a very large loan that he made to it. John Jackson is a director of Purepay Retail Limited and CUFC Holdings.

    Folk tend to associate the 1921 debt with PD as a short-hand for Purepay Retail Limited, which he controls. PD most assuredly is controlling the 1921 debt from the Purepay Retail Limited end.
    Last edited by _Stefan_Kuntz; 03-02-2022 at 11:34 AM.

  8. #8
    Anyone new would be an improvement. But with a popular and independant forum that is well run to keep them held to account

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    3,358
    Quote Originally Posted by FactsPriest View Post
    Anyone new would be an improvement. But with a popular and independant forum that is well run to keep them held to account
    Ffs .. Fo0k off kno8head

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5,180
    I think we need a Carlisle fan who has wide experience in negotiating at this level. So a UF new member Laffy would be my choice if he is interested, while at the same time I do not know other potential candidates

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •