Have we turned the corner?

[MadAmster]

Reports on skysports news last night suggest all 3 parties have been advised to tender their bids, all creditors have been satisfied and we are informing the EFL we will be coming out of administration at the end of next week Proof of funding until the end of the season are also being submitted, thus allowing the transfer embargo to be lifted
Wazza now has until 24th March to get free agents in, of which I believe he has talked to players willing to get us over the line.

https://www.skysports.com/football/n...forward-offers

[Trickytreesreds]

Reports on skysports news last night suggest all 3 parties have been advised to tender their bids, all creditors have been satisfied and we are informing the EFL we will be coming out of administration at the end of next week Proof of funding until the end of the season are also being submitted, thus allowing the transfer embargo to be lifted
Wazza now has until 24th March to get free agents in, of which I believe he has talked to players willing to get us over the line.

https://www.skysports.com/football/n...forward-offers

But something doesn't sit right with that statement.
A few weeks ago the administrators announced they had received formal bids from the three bidders.... Yet now they have written to them today asking for formal bids.... Interesting timing considering the announcements from the EFL....

[MadAmster]

But something doesn't sit right with that statement.
A few weeks ago the administrators announced they had received formal bids from the three bidders.... Yet now they have written to them today asking for formal bids.... Interesting timing considering the announcements from the EFL....

You mean that kerfuffed up organisation that has now decided to bring in a rule outlawing something they found us guilty of months ago?

This new rule makes a mockery of their case against DCFC and also that of Boro and WWFC.

[Trickytreesreds]

You mean that kerfuffed up organisation that has now decided to bring in a rule outlawing something they found us guilty of months ago?

This new rule makes a mockery of their case against DCFC and also that of Boro and WWFC.

Whatever the reason Maddy, I was saying the whole communication of events just doesn't make sense?

[Andy_Faber]

But something doesn't sit right with that statement.
A few weeks ago the administrators announced they had received formal bids from the three bidders.... Yet now they have written to them today asking for formal bids.... Interesting timing considering the announcements from the EFL....

This isn’t TopsyAnd Tim tricky, it’s a complex deal, all sorts may have changed that we the plebs aren’t aware of, the dynamics between the bidders might be a factor, other clubs sharking the bidders with their own pleas for investment etc. These people might be well heeled that me or even you but they are still a) hungry for a bargain and b) keen not to pick up the **** end of a stick

[Trickytreesreds]

This isn’t TopsyAnd Tim tricky, it’s a complex deal, all sorts may have changed that we the plebs aren’t aware of, the dynamics between the bidders might be a factor, other clubs sharking the bidders with their own pleas for investment etc. These people might be well heeled that me or even you but they are still a) hungry for a bargain and b) keen not to pick up the **** end of a stick

I never said I understood it. Just said it din't make sense. But I get your point Andy.
I suppose like everyone else, I'm just confused by what the EFL and administrators release.
One minute its imminent, the next its doomsday. Then they repeat something said ages ago?

[swaledale]

But something doesn't sit right with that statement.
A few weeks ago the administrators announced they had received formal bids from the three bidders.... Yet now they have written to them today asking for formal bids.... Interesting timing considering the announcements from the EFL....

Oh dear Thicky do you see conspiracy in everything? What is so difficult to understand about this? Up until now, any interested parties will have given bids, but most likely with qualifications. The qualifications we know about were the claims from Boro and Wycombe, but there may well be others such as ownership or lease of the ground, training ground etc.

From what is being said now and remember we are not privy to all the details in a complex case like this, is an invitation for the interested parties to make their best and final offers. in other words its time to put up or shut up.

[Trickytreesreds]

Oh dear Thicky do you see conspiracy in everything? What is so difficult to understand about this? Up until now, any interested parties will have given bids, but most likely with qualifications. The qualifications we know about were the claims from Boro and Wycombe, but there may well be others such as ownership or lease of the ground, training ground etc.

From what is being said now and remember we are not privy to all the details in a complex case like this, is an invitation for the interested parties to make their best and final offers. in other words its time to put up or shut up.

Oh look, my ignore button has been bypassed again.

Liar, liar pants on fire.
Plank

[swaledale]

Oh look, my ignore button has been bypassed again.

Liar, liar pants on fire.
Plank

Eh? I guess if you were rather dim you would think that, excepting the fact that your post was quoted by Andy Faber and is therefore visible to me, (which is clear from the post above mine) but hey why would I be surprised at you jumping to conclusions which turn out to be false? I mean its not as if most of the content of your posts isn't false drivel is it?

Oh yes I did open the post I'm responding to (you can tell as I've quoted it) just out of interest, wasn't really worth it, but then that's what you being on ignore means, I have a choice, which most of the time I exercise in not reading the piffle you post.

[Trickytreesreds]

Eh? I guess if you were rather dim you would think that, excepting the fact that your post was quoted by Andy Faber and is therefore visible to me, (which is clear from the post above mine) but hey why would I be surprised at you jumping to conclusions which turn out to be false? I mean its not as if most of the content of your posts isn't false drivel is it?

Oh yes I did open the post I'm responding to (you can tell as I've quoted it) just out of interest, wasn't really worth it, but then that's what you being on ignore means, I have a choice, which most of the time I exercise in not reading the piffle you post.

Bull****

Rumbled and full of it.

Lies upon lies