+ Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: UK giving warships to Ukraine.

  1. #11
    I wonder who our hapless government will back when Serbia and Kosovo kick off another war?

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    Neither am I, if NATO took it seriously, it would all be over bar the shouting within a week.
    NATO are not getting involved Sinkov because they know they would get beat and badly beaten.The Ukrainian army has over 240.000 active personell all trained to NATO standard.The Yanks and Brits have been training them for the last eight years.They have a further 300.000 reservists.They are getting beat by 150-190.000 Russians.Russia has an active military 0f 1.050.000 men with 2.000.000 reserves.
    NATO does not have the manpower, the industrial base nor logisitics to compete with Russia in Ukraine.They would get annihalated just like the Ukrainians are getting annihilated becuase they would run out of ammunition in 2 months.That is not me talking but a British military think tank.

    https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-res...strial-warfare

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    Neither am I, if NATO took it seriously, it would all be over bar the shouting within a week.
    NATO are not getting involved Sinkov because they know they would get beat and badly beaten.The Ukrainian army has over 240.000 active personell all trained to NATO standard.The Yanks and Brits have been training them for the last eight years.They have a further 300.000 reservists.They are getting beat by 150-190.000 Russians.Russia has an active military 0f 1.050.000 men with 2.000.000 reserves.
    NATO does not have the manpower, the industrial base nor logisitics to compete with Russia in Ukraine.They would get annihalated just like the Ukrainians are getting annihilated becuase they would run out of ammunition in 2 months.That is not me talking but a British military think tank.

    https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-res...strial-warfare

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,194
    When I say NATO CiB, I mean the USA. If their military really wanted to, they could obliterate the Red Army virtually overnight, but they won't, they can't, because it would lead to a nuclear conflagration. All I am saying is, they could.

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    When I say NATO CiB, I mean the USA. If their military really wanted to, they could obliterate the Red Army virtually overnight, but they won't, they can't, because it would lead to a nuclear conflagration. All I am saying is, they could.
    The Yanks could not beat neither the Vietcong nor the Taliban sinkov, I think you underestimate the sheer expanse of the Russian Federation mon ami, never mind old chap, so did Adolf Hitler.

    Who wants a "nuclear conflagration" anyway?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    5,144
    Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post

    Who wants a "nuclear conflagration" anyway?
    The Russians have also lost every war they've been in since WW2. Afghans absolutely pumped them.
    But it's the "unseen war" that they lost big time. USSR dismantled, the West dominating the world economy, the expansion of NATO - all the reasons why Putin is desperate to try to rebuild the Russkyy Mir.

    Lavrov has threatened nuclear strikes regularly. Russian State TV has frequently advocated nuclear war - and recently stated London would be first on the list. They talked about taking out the enemy satellites and how their nuclear defence system would remain intact.
    As if.
    TBH I watched discussions on Russian State TV about it and it seemed like the state puppets on show were oblivious to the risk or the fact that every major Russian city and town would be annihilated in minutes.
    OK they were willy waving but that recklessness is the main reason the West won't put boots on the ground - basically because the West has most to lose and China most to gain if nuclear war broke out.
    Last edited by wanderlust; 03-08-2022 at 12:07 PM.

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by wanderlust View Post
    The Russians have also lost every war they've been in since WW2. Afghans absolutely pumped them.
    But it's the "unseen war" that they lost big time. USSR dismantled, the West dominating the world economy, the expansion of NATO - all the reasons why Putin is desperate to try to rebuild the Russkyy Mir.

    Lavrov has threatened nuclear strikes regularly. Russian State TV has frequently advocated nuclear war - and recently stated London would be first on the list. They talked about taking out the enemy satellites and how their nuclear defence system would remain intact.
    As if.
    TBH I watched discussions on Russian State TV about it and it seemed like the state puppets on show were oblivious to the risk or the fact that every major Russian city and town would be annihilated in minutes.
    OK they were willy waving but that recklessness is the main reason the West won't put boots on the ground - basically because the West has most to lose and China most to gain if nuclear war broke out.
    They have hypersonic weapons Wander-they have the upper hand.Just one launched from Russia would reach the UK in 4-5 minutes and no defence can stop it.8 warheads per missile.That is enough for the entire UK.The West is playing catch up.

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    When I say NATO CiB, I mean the USA. If their military really wanted to, they could obliterate the Red Army virtually overnight, but they won't, they can't, because it would lead to a nuclear conflagration. All I am saying is, they could.
    You mean the same army that was forced to flee Afghanistan in the middle of the night by men in flip flops and kakashikovs?
    The reason they are not going into Ukraine officially(Their are NATO personell on the ground instructing the Ukrainians and contractors fighting with the Ukrainians)is 1.Because they know they would lose. 2 It could lead to a nuclear confrontation in which case Russia again has the upper hand.3.The aim of this proxy war was to weaken Russia at the cost of Ukrainian lives but Russia is stronger than ever whilst the West is collapsing economically.
    Last edited by ClaretinBudapest; 03-08-2022 at 01:34 PM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •