Quote Originally Posted by millmoormagic View Post
Cheeky at best that, John2 is one of the few on here who does back his arguments up with fact, but then gets lambasted for being 'the google king' by folk like you....facts are facts, wherever they're sourced.
You often let yourself down MMM. The statement "...facts are facts, wherever they're sourced." is so idiotic as to defy comment. The point I was making (as you well know) is that John is constantly selective in his evidence. When counter evidence is presented to him (or Kerr) he simply ignores it, disappears and spouts the same selective garbage a few weeks later. Kerr's favourite is to ignore 4 out of 5 points which disagree with him and and then spin the 5th point stating that because it was in the Times, Sunday Times etc it's obviously Murdoch propaganda. You lefties are the most illiberal mob of dissemblers I've ever encountered.