Quote Originally Posted by Taintedice View Post
Who knew Forbes and co would be hostile to FPS and again, if you could stop confusing DFCSS members with the wider fanbase, I think that would be good.

So, DFCSS will refuse to see the shares to FPS and put an end to any cooperation with the club owners?
Don't know how you reached this conclusion Taintedice. The DFCSS board were asking their members about the idea that DFCSS should sell their A shares to FPS. Nobody spoke up in favour of this proposal, and my impression was that nobody thought it was an idea that could be accepted until FPS provided a lot more justification for asking for the sale of the A shares. There were repeated comments about wanting to help FPS, but the point that seemed to carry a lot of weight that the AShares were designed as a bulwark against any majority shareholder. It was not in any way a specific measure against FPS.

You have got the lack of cooperation completely the wrong way round. DFCSS have been excluded, despite offers from DFCSS to discuss ways to help the club. The community aspect is not as straightforward as might appear. It might be much more beneficial for the club to have the community outreach managed by the club. This is one of the areas that a bit of clarity from FPS might be very helpful.

One of the restraints which forms part of the A Shares restrictions relates specifically to amalgamation. I don't know how you feel about that possibility but I would imagine that if, without any consultation with their members and the wider fan base, DFCSS sold the A shares and then FPS announced a merger with our neighbours playing at Tannadice, there might be a wee bit of unrest.

The people involved are all trying to do their best for the club. You can help by raising the issues that worry you. I know you distrust the motives of DFCSS. That's your prerogative and it helps to encourage scrutiny of what is going on. What do you think DFCSS should do about the AShares?