Quote Originally Posted by BigLadonOS View Post
PMSL. So your argument is a post that does not disclaim anything in the article I posted but states the writers opinion of what he thinks the writer of the article I posted meant when he wrote it!

I give in mate I rely do,
What the article is doing is pointing out how Gilligan is using non provable suggestions to molly that they are facts, when they are at least only half true and certainly don't add up to Corbyn supporting any violent actions of this organisation. Usual half baked implications and smear in afraid, but its what the writer wants you to hear and what you want to hear.