Quote Originally Posted by sawmiller View Post
Are they looking at regulation change to head off the prospect of any legal action following a vote?
No, they need the regulation (rule) change authorising otherwise they'd be acting ultra vires (beyond their powers).

The proposals and the order of business all make sense. What I dont understand is the ridiculous timeframe and constant stretching of that timeframe. That makes me suspicious that theres something else at play, which we arent being made aware of.