Quote Originally Posted by SBRed48 View Post
The "one or two" is clearly yet another dig at me after your "disciples" dig the last time you posted on here. I am becoming worried for you about your developing obsession Bill.

Your post does not "clear things up". There is an element of doubt in this unusual season as to whether any conversion of loan to permanent which was intended to occur at the end of a season still applies when the season has not yet finished. I am convinced that had Hoss wished to frustrate Hull to deny a relegation rival his services he would have reverted to his usual legal challenge mode. I am convinced he just rolled over in order to get the money from Hull. I agree Hull were not rivals in January but my point is letting him go without a fight to our present relegation rivals.
You may have sight of the contract which specifies it must be 30th June rather than what was stated in January that it would be until the end of the season. If so please quote the relevant section.
Your self importance knows no bounds.It wasn't a dig at you or anyone. I posted because some didn't seem to know what the deal consisted of.If Struber doesn't want or rate any player why should we be lumbered paying possibly 4/6k a week for a player to sit on his settee at home smoking whatever he was filmed smoking a few months ago.I know you don't like the owners I've no problem with that it's your choice but on this occasion surely they've acted on the fact the manager doesn't rate him rightly or wrongly .The deal was agreed in January not July .Transfers happen at every club but it seems are club are found to be wrong in everything they do and in my view that's got to be wrong.
Stendel for example the once shining light at Oakwell took over a struggling team in Hearts and the first thing he did was to release 2 experienced club legends and replace one of them with a 20 year, old just what a relegation threatened team need.My point being all managers see things from a different perspective to us mere supporters.
From a legal point of view I can't see what more the board could have done.