Quote Originally Posted by hmac View Post
So not tested?

I know you know the difference so a simple yes or no will do 😊
Yes. I'd say it has been tested as the potential defendant gave in without a fight and admitted liability.

I can't get the better of Mike Tyson, I don't need that to be put to the test in a ring.

The authorities and media instead of trying to hide this case or not cover it on MSM should be alerting business owners that this is the consequence of discriminating.

Luckily I've not come across much of it here and hopefully it continues to be the case or is disability discrimination laws which were hard fought for and won over the decades gonna be ignored under the guise of covid as well as numerous other things.

Woman was perfectly entitled to shop, they refused entry, she with backing threatened to sue......They admitted discrimination and paid out.......I don't think there's much more to say.

I don't think she's went out of her way to find an excuse, shes no a serial pavement stripper or falling Doon manholes type of person.

As for the hairdresser, why give that as a reason for not giving someone a job.

Stupid and opened himself or herself up to being sued.

So you really have to say Muslim woman was within her rights.

If it's the case they are just presuming that's why she didn't get the job then that's wrong.

Hairdressers.....learn to lie.....you do it with 95% of your customers anyway.🙄