After a review of the "evidence" I recalibrated my response to this vaccination bollox...

The simple truth is no-one in the scientific community knows how long the immunity to the Sars Covid virus from vaccinations lasts.
It is accepted the jab does not provide immunity from contacting the virus, but it is claimed a person will be less at risk of dying or hospitalisation from Covid should they wish to accept the risk of cerebral haemorrhaging following a vaccination.

The mad scientists of SAGE have not got a clue if any of the variants that have been reported in other parts of the world, including Brazil and South Africa, will thwart efforts to defeat the virus. It seems to me the men in the white coats are still wetting their finger, holding it up to the wind and hoping for the best.

Shock and horror: we are being threatened with a late summer spike in Covid cases and hospitalisations. SAGE and the team of mad scientists seems to have accepted the real-world data from vaccine inoculation and have now concluded that the vaccines are not as good as initially heralded. In the real-world, infected people are still dying from the SAR Covid virus and further spikes are predicted, even amongst the already vaccinated.

No wonder on the release of this real-life data, we end up with SAGE predicting more frightening spikes; even after most of the UK population has been vaccinated. Is it really worth risking a cerebral haemorrhage?