I think, 6EQ, you have to provide an alternate explanation of wave/particle duality if you wish to refute the simulation hypothesis.

It's not enough to say "it could be the reason, but I don't think it is". You've strayed away from a logical line of thought, backed up by evidence, and taken a view which is purely one of faith and belief. You can't criticise things for being "not science" after presenting an argument yourself which isn't scientific.

It doesn't follow there would be more examples, the quantum evidence is fundamental to everything (all observable reality), how could you possibly have a larger smoking gun?

Anyway, I look forward to your alternate explanation.