I'm retired now but I've had a lifetime of employment in science based jobs.
One thing I know is the folly of making wide reaching assumptions on dodgy data that in the long run has no real basis in truth.
For example, it could be said that blind people have a greater chance of catching covid.
How?
Because toilet doors have braille signs that they are " forced" to touch thus increasing their chance of picking up the virus.
Call it Grist's hypothesis, get a dumb journalist to write it up in the Guardian and shazam it becomes " fact"




Reply With Quote