Quote Originally Posted by Jampie View Post
The media should report:

  • An arrest
  • On a trial
  • A verdict
  • Sentencing


If the trial is open to the press they can report on the evidence presented and who said what. But they should do so in a balanced manner (i.e. present the prosecution's evidence and the defence's)

Accusations are not news. Investigations aren't news (and the press probably just annoy investigating police). Opinion is not news. Rumour is not news. Speculation is not news. Maybe you can put those things in a gossip column but they do NOT belong under a 'news' banner.

Perhaps if the police _aren't_ investigating something and the press determine legitimately that they should be, maybe that's worth an article. Otherwise, wait for an arrest to report on.
The trouble with this is certain crimes go unreported, particularly when the person being accused is in a position of power who can silence witnesses, cover up or influence a cover up. Reporting on the allegations gives others the strength to come forward and so strengthens the case. If this reduces the possibility of a cover up or people using their power to commit crimes, then I think it is good thing.

I won't comment about Brand as I have been highly suspicious of him following his comments in the Jonny Depp vs Amber Heard case.