Carlos

[baggieal]

Your posts are so full of contradictions and opinions that you present as facts. I imagine you sat waiting for Boingy to post so you can pull it apart as in when he simply posted the fact we were 6th and you responded by return with.

'Let?s be so f uckin happy for a draw today then and one point and not moan about the two points lost albeit we played well.

PS - were you the fat kid at school where competition didn?t matter - it was all in competing rather than winning?'
[/I]

Is that in anyway constructive?

I imagine you sat at a match waiting for Furlong to make a mistake so you can come here and let the world know.

And I'll ask once again who made you the arbiter of who is a good poster. YOU may think someone knows his football (what you actually mean is he agrees with you) others like me may think not much of a poster's opinions. I present that as an opinion unlike you not a fact!

All I ask is you practice what you preach and respect other posters and by all means disagree and give your side but don't go for the jugular when they post something you don't agree with

So is it acceptable to say we matched Bournemouth in the first half and for those who didn?t think so must be on drugs? Is this true? Should someone not respond? Should somebody who sits in his armchair make a strong statement like that over someone who gets off their a rse and pays good money to go to a match?

Why the hell would I want any of our players to make mistakes? If this was the case why would I waste my time going tomorrow night in the freezing cold. I was very doubtful of Styles and have recently said he?s been one of our best players. I was critical of Grant on the past but he?s been player of the season. Many are critical of Disngana but I have said he would do well with fast flowing football or under Mowbray!

I am critical of what I see ie Wallace and Cole but again unless they prove me otherwise - I?m no different to the majority.

I am sure in your eyes your the judge of a good poster!!