Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds View Post
Absolute bull****.

This isn't an exaggeration, she's an habitual liar, in one of the most important jobs in the country.
Still you don't seem to see Two tier incapable of getting anything wrong, so it must be fine.

How far back do you want to go? Would you employ someone not qualified in a job that lied, or maybe an ex criminal who failed to reveal it when asked?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c77r05nx11po
Oh do give it a rest, Tricky. I see you’re suddenly quoting the BBC now it suits, but Sith isn’t talking ‘absolute bull****’, he’s just trying to be even handed about it.
If you want an example of inaccuracy then it’s Andy saying she worked for the BoE for ‘just over four’ years. According to the BoE she worked there from September 2000 until March 2006 which, by most people’s reckoning, would be around five and a half years, but of course you won’t criticise AF’s account because 1) he’s the moderator and 2) his view supports your own.
Did she exaggerate? It would seem so, as have some of her critics. Is that acceptable? Not really and she should know better. Are we surprised? Hardly…she’s a politician talking about her achievements. Does it matter enormously? What GP said yesterday.