
Originally Posted by
Timmy58
Gazan, you are right. Mike is either saying all this to provoke a reaction (I succumbed I am sad to say) or he is really living in the past. The past where kids were sent down mines or up chimneys, where mental health was neither talked about or recognised. We have progressed thank God (although I do worry about the rise of a certain political party/limited company!) and the recognition that players and managers can have struggles that are personal. His argument is flawed because Manchester United, who are the classic example of both sides of the coin, have changed their manager more often than some change their beds and have not managed to repeat the success they had with a manager who was a "failure" for the first 5 years at OT. The policy of giving a manager 6 months to be successful will ensure that in time you will be back to ones you have had before and, by definition, will be taking managers on who have failed somewhere else. It really is laughable!