Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
A ‘weak evasion’. In what way?

‘Clash with my moral compass’? Well, yes - call it unusual - but my moral compass does tell me that it’s very wrong for anyone - let alone a local councillor’s wife - to go online and advocate arson and murder.

The comparison with other cases, not something I know about or am prepared to enter into discussion with you over.

You ‘suspect this has everything to do with your political leanings, more than justice’? Suggest you go and take a long hard look in the mirror.
lol, classic. Had I, been the one calling for strict and aggressive policing and justice, you'd have been calling me a hard right winger and Nazi. It seems your call for justice on people calling for action of violence online, is rather one sided chap.
Your mask slipped when you introduced the Tory councillors wife bit.

Lets just put some context on your stance. Lucy posted a bonkers tweet. She retracted it and apologised. She didn't actually hurt anyone. Even when the police pulled her, she pleaded guilty. Her first offence in her life. YET GOT 31 MONTHS FOR IT.

Now here is a collection of people who ACTUALLY DID CAUSE HARM AND DEATH including arson that you keep mentioning. Try comparing their sentences, or lack of to what Connolly received.

Then have a think about it and tell me, she wasn't nailed to a cross, to make a political point to suit Kier Starmer calling for fast and swift action.
Its pretty damned sick in essence, especially as in this video, where Starmer is telling everyone about free speech, yet then doubles down on punishing anyone outside it.

https://fb.watch/z-hUjuCH7m/