Tazzcompe matchday 2 and tabke

[tazzydjr]

**** this tazzy I'm out. Youse is ofing a ****ing laugh with yer ****ing mental rules which youse is making up as you ****ing go along. How can you avoid ****ing duplication of occasional ****ing entrances in a ****ing predictocomp which I of only entered to test a scientific ****ing theory you ****ing ****er?

You useless ****ing moron.

if griff goes...i go

#solidarnosc[/quote]

nobody's going nowhere

[John_Ridley]

Woooah Taz ****ing woooah.

If we ARE using the duplication rule it should only apply to the original semi-final fixtures.

When the entrances were entranced the players involved weren't to know that judd wouldn't enter.

Offing then been reduced to a 3-way finale, I think there shouldn't actually be any points deductions at all.

I was merely seeking clarification of your rules, that's all.

I don't think griff should be deducted owt for the two scores that are the same as mine.



However, offing submitted his predictions AFTER the first game had kicked-off on matchday 1 - he may of fallen foul off of summat. But I'm not party to which game that was tbf. If it were the Senegalese one then I doubt very much he had inkling as to how things were going in that ****er.
And he scored nowt from it anyway.

If it were one of the Leg 1 games from which he scored points, then that may need reviewing.

[kel_]

Hello?

[Floppy_funbags]

Bit slack in the Tudor Rose empire Ridders?


griff, calm down, it's a 'non-noticeable points deduction' so you won't, erm... notice it.

[griff]

**** this tazzy I'm out. Youse is ofing a ****ing laugh with yer ****ing mental rules which youse is making up as you ****ing go along. How can you avoid ****ing duplication of occasional ****ing entrances in a ****ing predictocomp which I of only entered to test a scientific ****ing theory you ****ing ****er?

You useless ****ing moron.

Griff sorry about the confusion but last time i checked you were only getting a non noticeable points deduction (2) just this fantasy table whats been made up by ridders makes you more of a criminal[/quote]

What do ****ing mean MORE off of a criminal, you ****. I were never a criminal in the fust spot.

Listen very carefully you septic abortion...

The GIANT is out.

[tazzydjr]

Woooah Taz ****ing woooah.

If we ARE using the duplication rule it should only apply to the original semi-final fixtures.

When the entrances were entranced the players involved weren't to know that judd wouldn't enter.

Offing then been reduced to a 3-way finale, I think there shouldn't actually be any points deductions at all.

I was merely seeking clarification of your rules, that's all.

I don't think griff should be deducted owt for the two scores that are the same as mine.



However, offing submitted his predictions AFTER the first game had kicked-off on matchday 1 - he may of fallen foul off of summat. But I'm not party to which game that was tbf. If it were the Senegalese one then I doubt very much he had inkling as to how things were going in that ****er.
And he scored nowt from it anyway.

If it were one of the Leg 1 games from which he scored points, then that may need reviewing.

[tazzydjr]

Bit slack in the Tudor Rose empire Ridders?


griff, calm down, it's a 'non-noticeable points deduction' so you won't, erm... notice it.

well said kenny is right for once Griff

[kel_]

I'll of griff's place even though you are CLEARLY ignoring my ladbrokes post.

Am I back in?

[John_Ridley]

[quote="tazzydjr"]Woooah Taz ****ing woooah.

If we ARE using the duplication rule it should only apply to the original semi-final fixtures.

When the entrances were entranced the players involved weren't to know that judd wouldn't enter.

Offing then been reduced to a 3-way finale, I think there shouldn't actually be any points deductions at all.

I was merely seeking clarification of your rules, that's all.

I don't think griff should be deducted owt for the two scores that are the same as mine.



However, offing submitted his predictions AFTER the first game had kicked-off on matchday 1 - he may of fallen foul off of summat. But I'm not party to which game that was tbf. If it were the Senegalese one then I doubt very much he had inkling as to how things were going in that ****er.
And he scored nowt from it anyway.

If it were one of the Leg 1 games from which he scored

[John_Ridley]

Bit slack in the Tudor Rose empire Ridders?

Arfs. Actually, no. The rigours of compe have coincided with a busy time on the work frontage. Which makes the whole thing even more enjoyable.

BF Kings Head Thurs/Fri btw.