+ Visit Wolverhampton Wanderers FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Aston Villa Friendly

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    29,491

    re: 're: 're: 're: 're: 're: 're: 're: 're: Aston Villa Friendly''''''''

    I don't think Wolves started that great greavsey, conceded the early goal and could've been a couple more behind in the opening twenty minutes or so. It took a while for Wolves to find their feet if you ask me, but once Wolves started to get McDonald on the ball and Coady getting in some decent challenges Wolves looked better. Under pressure in the opening twenty minutes the mentality was to look for the run of Edwards, Afobe or Dicko.

    I enjoyed the game, it may have been just a friendly, but it was played in some thing like a cup tie and atmosphere to go with it.

    Wolves showed that can dig deep against better players and as well as the two goals could have had a couple more.





  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    29,491

    re: 're: 're: 're: 're: Aston Villa Friendly''''

    Highlights if you haven't already seen them. - view external link

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    15,426

    re: 're: 're: 're: 're: 're: 're: 're: Aston Villa Friendly'''''''

    I only watched the first half but that is pretty mutch what I saw. McDonald hardly in the game, no composite midfield play. The truth is Villa were more compotent and relaxed and worked through mid field as a unit. But maybe splaying it wide is what Kenny is looking for. Dunno.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,901

    re: 're: 're: 're: 're: 're: 're: 're: 're: Aston Villa Friendly''''''''

    Ok so it was only a friendly but for 20 mins we didn't seem to have a midfield. Well I suppose we did but I'm not sure it knew how it was supposed to play! The lack of at least one natural wide man looked bloody obvious with us leaving gaping holes in the centre of the park that Villa took advantage of. We were damned lucky not to be at least two down after ten minutes and it was only when Iorfa started to overlap with Henry we started to look threatening ourselves. We offered little from the left side in attack and that's a bit worrying. You can get away without any natural old style wingers if you have at least one really good attacking midfielder that can play the role, especially if there is a competent wing-back to cover but I don't think we have. Although Iorfa is a promising youngster Henry doesn't have the consistent delivery. On the other side I'm not sure Goldbourne is a natural wing-back,he always seems to get too close to the player he's covering that it just stalls the tem

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •