Quote Originally Posted by Mook1 View Post
How would the part in bold work then? Would they go back in time to watch the replays?

The second paragraph is just a load of utter shyte, of course I think Football should be fair but I don't think it's so unfair at the moment that it needs changing an awful lot. Sometimes referees get things wrong, life goes on.

if you think "of course Football should be fair" why are you railing so much against the introduction of video evidence? claiming that it would somehow cause a (currently smooth running?) game to become stop start, have endless delays and even infomercials or whatever those damn things are called?
Nobody is suggesting doing away with fitba as we know it - just use a technology which already exists and is beamed into fans livingrooms anyway to ensure that the correct and fair (see above) decision is made. It's a very straight forward concept for all but the luddites.


If a ref declares he's a Hibs fan for instance, then as long as he's reffing games that don't involve Hibs then he's unlikely to get the accusations of bias he currently gets is he?

You really are getting all nervous and shifty about something that is for the betterment of the game. Nobody has anything to fear from transparency surely?