
Originally Posted by
harpo88
You can't choose what air you breathe in.
People who sell guns don't kill people.
The thing is Ellis is that principle and precedent are important, not least as the basis of our legal system. So if you're advocating far stricter measures against one type of person who makes a choice that harms lots of people, would you not advocate that for others who do it in a different way? If you say that terrorism, or being even slightly or accidentally complicit in it, is a special case then you might well be right, but there's a question as to whether it should be.