Please go...

[deek5trans]

Think you've listed some valid reasons why getting rid of the manager would indeed be a good thing!!

[DouglasQOS]

There has to be a young manager out there who believes that attacking football is what is needed or is it the Scottish coaching courses that keep sending out managers who think that the first thing to do is not get beaten. Notice I say young manager because I believe all the older guys all believe in negative football.
The BOD should write it in there contract that if they don't play attacking football they get sacked with no pay out LOL.

[jardi]

Don't think you quite understand the basic economic rationale behind sacking a manager on a whim; - you need to firstly compensate that manager, - then go through hoops to bring in someone else, - (who might not be any better) and pay them the same salary.

Better by far, - to spend a fraction of that enormous outlay on bringing in 3 or 4 players and at least seeing if that makes a difference. Alternatively you pay off Naysmith, invest in a new manager and you still have to bring in 3 or 4 new players.

Logic tells me that we stick with the present manager, get the players that a blind man can see we need and then re-assess the situation.

If at that point, there is no betterment, - say Queens are adrift at the bottom of the league by the beginning of November, - then urgent action such as replacing the manager would be an obvious option.