midfield

[WTF11]

So every game Leeds don't win or play in the way you think they should, we're going to have to read your constant arrogant negative drivel.

Does that also now mean every game Huddersfield win we're gonna have to read the same rubbish.

Leeds didn't play well on Saturday, could've lost, could've won but yout level of scrutiny after 1 game is bonkers. God help us if we lose tonight.

Go watch f*cking Eastleigh.

I might decide to contribute the occasional post, I might not, irrespective of the results, my choice, just as it's your choice to read and/or respond, yes?

I doubt I'll be making any further comment regarding Dudds, I'm a Leeds supporter after all (no matter what you and other may think or say).

As for watching Eastleigh, yes I will occasionally.

[Jezleeds]

I might decide to contribute the occasional post, I might not, irrespective of the results, my choice, just as it's your choice to read and/or respond, yes?

I doubt I'll be making any further comment regarding Dudds, I'm a Leeds supporter after all (no matter what you and other may think or say).

As for watching Eastleigh, yes I will occasionally.

Just in the spirit of trying to help here WTF - don't shoot me down, although I'm guessing you might feel like it....

As a (usually) uninvolved observer of a LOT of these conversations, I think the problem often arises because, whatever the detail or nuance that you think is in them, you make comments that appear very dogmatic and more often than not, at the extreme end of a point of view.

You then end up trying to explain your view and backtracking through the detail when so many others take issue with what you've said, because the initial post was so 'black and white', rather than the 'grey' which most people see is there in everything in life, not just Leeds United.

I know it's good to have opinions and a forum is there to express them, but you can't be surprised or defensive if people pick them apart on the ground of logic, when it's always true that taking a strong one-dimensional stand on anything involves ignoring valid points in favour of simple assertion.

Just trying to help, but i'll put my tin hat on now and withdraw into my world of logic and moderation.

[Tichi1]

Just in the spirit of trying to help here WTF - don't shoot me down, although I'm guessing you might feel like it....

As a (usually) uninvolved observer of a LOT of these conversations, I think the problem often arises because, whatever the detail or nuance that you think is in them, you make comments that appear very dogmatic and more often than not, at the extreme end of a point of view.

You then end up trying to explain your view and backtracking through the detail when so many others take issue with what you've said, because the initial post was so 'black and white', rather than the 'grey' which most people see is there in everything in life, not just Leeds United.

I know it's good to have opinions and a forum is there to express them, but you can't be surprised or defensive if people pick them apart on the ground of logic, when it's always true that taking a strong one-dimensional stand on anything involves ignoring valid points in favour of simple assertion.

Just trying to help, but i'll put my tin hat on now and withdraw into my world of logic and moderation.

BTW, nice answer, completely avoiding the question in my post.

Then again, you, WS, Joel, Tich et al are all incapable of actually answering any question I might pose, preferring to rubbish the poster instead, nice one. [QUOTE]

You see why I don't bother answering any of his questions 'cos it doesn't matter how reasoned a response is given [Fisher/Stomp/joel] this numpty will either backtrack, call you plain dumb for not "Getting" his point, or eventually just bore the pants off you as he has to have the last word on EVERY subject - not to mention bringing on the depression from the constant stream of whinging and negativity. I've found just insulting him is the best answer - he tends to not respond, so if everyone just insulted him he might just f*uck off - though I shouldn't condone such actions as they could be deemed as bullying.

As for others avoiding answering his questions - well sometimes amid all the drivel it's quite hard to work out what the actual f*ucking question was??

[WTF11]

[QUOTE=Tichi1;38622099]BTW, nice answer, completely avoiding the question in my post.

Then again, you, WS, Joel, Tich et al are all incapable of actually answering any question I might pose, preferring to rubbish the poster instead, nice one.

You see why I don't bother answering any of his questions 'cos it doesn't matter how reasoned a response is given [Fisher/Stomp/joel] this numpty will either backtrack, call you plain dumb for not "Getting" his point, or eventually just bore the pants off you as he has to have the last word on EVERY subject - not to mention bringing on the depression from the constant stream of whinging and negativity. I've found just insulting him is the best answer - he tends to not respond, so if everyone just insulted him he might just f*uck off - though I shouldn't condone such actions as they could be deemed as bullying.

As for others avoiding answering his questions - well sometimes amid all the drivel it's quite hard to work out what the actual f*ucking question was??

Ok, in the interests of getting questions answered, please refer to post #42, it was put in simple, plain english and yet has (apparently), flummoxed all you bright boys. Care to try your hand?

BTW, you think Fisher/WS/Joels replies were "reasoned"? Well, then again, you would.

[Tichi1]

[QUOTE=WTF11;38622127]

BTW, nice answer, completely avoiding the question in my post.

Then again, you, WS, Joel, Tich et al are all incapable of actually answering any question I might pose, preferring to rubbish the poster instead, nice one.

Ok, in the interests of getting questions answered, please refer to post #42, it was put in simple, plain english and yet has (apparently), flummoxed all you bright boys. Care to try your hand?

BTW, you think Fisher/WS/Joels replies were "reasoned"? Well, then again, you would.

Right on queue.....

[Fisher]

[QUOTE=WTF11;38622127]

BTW, nice answer, completely avoiding the question in my post.

Then again, you, WS, Joel, Tich et al are all incapable of actually answering any question I might pose, preferring to rubbish the poster instead, nice one.

Ok, in the interests of getting questions answered, please refer to post #42, it was put in simple, plain english and yet has (apparently), flummoxed all you bright boys. Care to try your hand?

BTW, you think Fisher/WS/Joels replies were "reasoned"? Well, then again, you would.

Joels responses were level headed & well reasoned I thought.

I don't mean to insult anybody but find the speed of some to start moaning so strange.

Heard it at the game on Saturday after about 20 mins - Phillips got a bit of stick.
Nobody said anything about Pontus's Cruyff turns that didn't come off and nearly cost us....funny that.

You can find positives and negatives in most situations in life, suppose it depends on your personality which trait you look for most.