Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
Not entirely sure it wouldn’t be setting a dangerous precedent to dictate to people what they can buy Manx but I don’t think it’s got much to do with me being a house owner or enjoying a certain amount of travel Rog.
Guess it’s all part of the ‘haves and have nots’ argument. There will always be people who earn and deserve to earn more than others, I accept that, but this is an extreme example and can it be right that people have such great wealth to spend so frivolously while others are literally starving and homeless?
As a World society we seem to have lost all notion of balance and proportion imo, and then there is the question of whether it is morally right for an individual to be able to purchase great art and possibly lock it away for ever, which may or may not be the case. I think I feel such artefacts should only be for sale to ********* where they may in turn be put on public display and in turn raise money for the public good but I know that will be way too idealistic for some.
How have I been bought in to this? I've not even commented yet!

There will never be another, so the price will only head one way..