Why not try something really unusual for you?
Read the post, don't just react to the name of the poster.
Saying that McC has engineered a win win shows he has done well, getting back to the PL he would indeed deserve to enjoy it and, fact, it would be good for 'everyone else with a SUFC connection'.
Still, when you have an agenda you have to pursue it regardles of content or context. It's so obviously in your nature.
Trying to portray someone as 'sad or obsessed' is quite pathetic, particularly when the one doing igt has has come up on the rails , overtaken the field and is far out of sight that no one else has a chance of the winner's (actually loser's) enclosure
Last edited by tomytony; 12-02-2018 at 10:44 AM.
The post referred to basking in glory on someone else's money. A McCabe dig however you want to play it with. A twee, win win comment after doesn't change that.
Prior to HRH coming onboard - an investor not a patsy - McCabe spent his money and his families inheritance, no one else's. When has he ever spent someone else's for a suggestion to be made like yours?
So I did read the post, you typed it however. As I said, you just can't help yourself.
As I said, let's have a look at your posts about McCabe versus my replies to you on the subject. The facts about who is obsessed are borne out by your daily comments about him. If I do the same to you you'd be scrambling over the forum. Instead, you say I'm the one with the agenda.
http://boards.footymad.net/showthrea...8213485&page=2
Have a look on page one on that thread, dig after dig I didn't reply once on that page. You're lying.
The proof of the pudding in this case is in the number of posts made by you, not my replies. .
There will be further proof because you're unable to stop yourself.
The irony of telling me I feel superior whilst trying to show you are, is also very funny.
Last edited by Holden_C; 12-02-2018 at 11:21 AM.
It's obviously in YOUR mind.
The number of posts is completely irrelevant but, of course, if you don't bother to read them and only look at the volume, you will ( repeatedly) draw the wrong conclusion
Of the 6 posts I made on that page one is about the declining value of pension investments. one is a humourous response to Gray about the prince's Belgian club being lined up as a feeder club,3 refer to the Prince's action maybe having been triggered by the lack of partner investment,and one is a humourous response to Ronnie protecting his shares.
You obviously want to see criticism of McC in everything I post.
Unfortunately the facts, and the posts, when you bother to read them, do not back up your claims...yet again.
The lastcouple of sentences of your post still try to sow the derogatory seeds of obsession but the most telling phrase in the whole post is "YOU'RE LYING".
Just as Carpe Diem was LYING about meeting McC???????????
Once you've got something in your head you resort to telling others they are lying whatever the truth maybe
Why,because it doesn't suit your agenda or fit with your stance?
It seems like there's only me been listenin to Gray's plea for BLADE bro luv on here.UTCB
How can the number of posts be irrelevant? Because it shows you posting criticism of McCabe on a non stop daily basis? The numbers absolutely count because that's the crux of my point. The sheer number of ( repetitive) posts about McCabe.
Lying? No, because the number of posts you make criticising McCabe far outnumbers the number of posts I make criticising you for making them. You say thats not the case while the search facility proves what your saying not true, and if it isn't true.......
Back to the thread I referenced, how many were critical of McCabe on that first page? 4 out of six. Sly little digs but digs nonetheless. Pretty much par for the course, which is my point.
The search facility is there to help. Or in your case hinder because your claims are... what's the word.
And you call other posters thick.
Feel free to have the last word, exaggerate your forum dominance, intelligence and pretend the thought of being challenged isn't the real reason for your obviously shattered forum ego. It's a poor do when you aren't safe behind a keyboard these days eh?