Quote Originally Posted by MrsORichSenior View Post
Briefly .........

Jez - Sharp Practice Definition .....Email Rad or FAO his lawyers 'bout it.
Prohibited conduct by a licensed lawyer in taking, or attempting to take advantage of a slip or overlooked technical matter by the other side to litigation, and to agree to reasonable requests which either prejudice his client or the interests of justice has serious consequences.
Take the matter up if you feel infringement has taken place - Good luck.

Happens all the time in Music,daily copyright writs are issued for 'alleged' misrepresentation issue.

WTF11 - Your views & opinions are always noted and offered to the club as I've stated prior so to suggest you've 'missed out' on expressing them today is not the case.I personally offered you the chance on here I recall too in a Post.


All your views are noted and I'd advise caution if your continued public opinions of Orta persist in the vein they are being expressed - Just saying like.

MOT
Being invited to put questions to the three board members 48 hourse AFTER the cut off for such questions to be received is by definition missing out on such an opportunity and I would have been delighted to put such questions, but hey ho.

Had that opportunity been available, I'd have been quite happy to challenge our DoF on the commercial beneficiaries of recent transfer transactions although I doubt I would get a straight answer. BTW my suggestions as to the changes that are required to focus Leeds on what will deliver in 1st team terms are hardly a secret, and I'm delighted to hear that they have been communicated to the club. I have no expectation however that any of them will be enacted in any way shape or form.

If your warning implies that there are sanctions that could be taken over the opinions i have expressed, then whoever might seek to do so had better have a very big roladex because any examination of social media would show I'm most certainly NOT in the minority.