+ Visit Leeds United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 10 of 65

Thread: Rads kicks off

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,503
    Quote Originally Posted by WTF11 View Post
    Lies, damned lies and statistics, you can find support for whatever side of the argument you're on.

    There are links I've posted previously, and another here;

    https://footballleagueworld.co.uk/wh...s-the-verdict/

    All of which would suggest that Radrizzani has overstepped the mark.

    Doesn't matter really, we'll see how the players perform on Friday at home, following the "pep talk" from the owner (compared to the half-decent performance against Reading away before he got on his hind legs), won't we?

    And before anyone gets all excited, of course I want a win, and for a clean sheet for BPF on the back of a good performance by the back four, etc etc, but I wouldn't be surprised if some of the 1st team starters are less than motivated (guess who), we will see.

    We could always keep voting until we get the outcome you want WTF?

    Posting a blog wrote by a Reading fan and you think that won't be a tad biased?

    Also the handful of comments aren't exactly damning are they?

    I don't disagree with AR's comments nor do I believe writing to the FA & EFL is sour grapes like you think. There are questions to be asked about the model Wolves are using this season and the more I read about it the more dodgy it seems so good on him.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,208
    Quote Originally Posted by CromerWhite View Post
    We could always keep voting until we get the outcome you want WTF?

    Posting a blog wrote by a Reading fan and you think that won't be a tad biased?

    Also the handful of comments aren't exactly damning are they?

    I don't disagree with AR's comments nor do I believe writing to the FA & EFL is sour grapes like you think. There are questions to be asked about the model Wolves are using this season and the more I read about it the more dodgy it seems so good on him.
    I was merely pointing out (and previous links have been from what you (might) consider less "partisan" sources), that there are as many for or against, depending on which source you choose to use.

    You can agree or not with the comments about Wolves, (although writing to the FA/EFL seems slightly contradictory, seeing as he stated in the same interview that he wants to copy their methods of getting players in!), and that wasn't my point and you surely must know that. It was the medium used, the scatter-gun nature and the sour grapes flavour (especially when viewed against his other comments about wanting to actually emulate what Wolves have done, made in the same interview),;

    https://www.footballinsider247.com/h...ds-masterplan/

    Whether we should be excited about what he said about wanting to copy Wolves is debatable! But as you think it's "dodgy" maybe Radrizzani will change his mind (as if).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,503
    Quote Originally Posted by WTF11 View Post
    I was merely pointing out (and previous links have been from what you (might) consider less "partisan" sources), that there are as many for or against, depending on which source you choose to use.

    You can agree or not with the comments about Wolves, (although writing to the FA/EFL seems slightly contradictory, seeing as he stated in the same interview that he wants to copy their methods of getting players in!), and that wasn't my point and you surely must know that. It was the medium used, the scatter-gun nature and the sour grapes flavour (especially when viewed against his other comments about wanting to actually emulate what Wolves have done, made in the same interview),;

    https://www.footballinsider247.com/h...ds-masterplan/

    Whether we should be excited about what he said about wanting to copy Wolves is debatable! But as you think it's "dodgy" maybe Radrizzani will change his mind (as if).
    Yet you only seem to post the negative ones that support your negative view. That's fair enough each to their own.

    AR's sold a stake in football agency because he was advised it would contravene EFL/FA regulations.

    He then finds out the owners of Wolves have a stake in football agency so how can it be surprising if he then wants clarification of the rules. If it turns out to all be above board then he says it would be a model he would consider following, What's wrong with that?

    I agree with his comments regarding the team and have no concerns about the when or how that message was delivered.

    That's just my opinion.

    "scatter gun nature" - my god how ironic!!

    Seriously you should think about blogging, if they get paid by the word you would soon be able to afford to buy the club yourself.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,208
    Quote Originally Posted by CromerWhite View Post
    Yet you only seem to post the negative ones that support your negative view. That's fair enough each to their own.

    AR's sold a stake in football agency because he was advised it would contravene EFL/FA regulations.

    He then finds out the owners of Wolves have a stake in football agency so how can it be surprising if he then wants clarification of the rules. If it turns out to all be above board then he says it would be a model he would consider following, What's wrong with that?

    I agree with his comments regarding the team and have no concerns about the when or how that message was delivered.

    That's just my opinion.

    "scatter gun nature" - my god how ironic!!

    Seriously you should think about blogging, if they get paid by the word you would soon be able to afford to buy the club yourself.
    As with another comment in response to one of my posts;

    ".......and have no concerns about the when or how that message was delivered".

    Glad you're not running Leeds United.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by CromerWhite View Post
    Yet you only seem to post the negative ones that support your negative view. That's fair enough each to their own.

    AR's sold a stake in football agency because he was advised it would contravene EFL/FA regulations.

    He then finds out the owners of Wolves have a stake in football agency so how can it be surprising if he then wants clarification of the rules. If it turns out to all be above board then he says it would be a model he would consider following, What's wrong with that?

    I agree with his comments regarding the team and have no concerns about the when or how that message was delivered.

    That's just my opinion.

    "scatter gun nature" - my god how ironic!!

    Seriously you should think about blogging, if they get paid by the word you would soon be able to afford to buy the club yourself.

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •