No Comment at the moment

[ShropshireAlex]

Thanks for that and wonder if that was made available to the wider media and press?

Well it was widely discussed in the national and local press - Radio Joke interviewed a woman solicitor from Slater Gordon saying they should have re-run the Police investigation in house at the club's expense.

That report said this..

Following Mr Bennell’s dismissal, the club acknowledges that Mr Gradi wrote to parents advising that he did not want any of the boys to attend other coaching sessions or games organised by Mr Bennell. The reason for this letter being written was simply because the club and Mr Gradi did not want to potentially lose any promising young players to a team coached by Mr Bennell. This letter was not written in the context of either the club or Mr Gradi having any knowledge of complaints for ***ual assault being made against Mr Bennell.

Sherlock Holmes would possibly say that didn't make sense as why not just sack the bloke? The parents were surely not in any position to know who was coaching at any particular session and how would they know in advance, when they arrived at RH? That really does not make sense at all at least to me...IF the club wanted to do that, they should have suspended Bennell full stop. Why didn't they my dear Watson?

As you have acknowledged elsewhere, your own quote says "Following .. Bennell's dismissal".

.............................

The question remains that if they have nothing to hide, they could have made that police investigation report PUBLIC and not just give it to the FA...Will the FA make ALL their investigations public when completed or just an abridged version?

Might need Police agreement to publish *their* report publicly, rather than simply supply it for another investigation (the FA's)?