This Rhodes idea doesn't seem to be going away. I suppose we all associate him with the problem-time.
I know someone who is a computer-science academic. He is brilliant in a very narrow field within that subject. He's pretty clueless in other respects. Rhodes was a bit like that as a footballer. Almost the opposite of someone like Bennett, who couldn't be called "brilliant", but who can turn his hand to anything. (Personally, I think Bennett could be the answer to the second keeper debate).
Definitely mixed feelings about Rhodes. Also, he doesn't fit the model TM has been talking about: early-twenties; eager to learn; on the way up.
Probably just more paper-talk.