The BBC were alright for the England game because all the pundits were ex-England players, it's when they have the people they've chosen for PC reasons that it gets tedious. Like these women who normally cover women's sports who come across like PE teachers. Nothing against women, but those I know best hated their PE teachers, my wife and my daughter included. They've not experienced the World Cup themselves, they just come out with parrot learned platitudes.
Keane and Bilic covered the Croatia game and Bilic let his national pride get the better of his judgment. I thought Keane looked ready to smack him.
Another thing that gets my goat is the BBC sending Lineker and co, to World wide destinations, just to provide a studio based commentary, what's the point? If it weren't for the fact that we're paying for it I wouldn't be bothered, such as ITV can do as they like, they realise their own cash stream, the BBC don't
NEITHER - get ur sen on Match TV Russia for some real commentary, pundits and action.
https://matchtv.ru/
[QUOTE=LaxtonLad;3892381It’s called generating an atmosphere.[/QUOTE]
From a studio that could be anywhere, how does that generate an atmosphere?
They could super impose a live backdrop in a London studio, instead, this lot will be on a month long jolly at our expense.
Last edited by Airborn Pie; 19-06-2018 at 02:52 PM.