i think we could get him in on 15k a week if we were to buy but i still think a loan is the most likely outcome
cant see us offering 3mill but maybe thats why jamal wasnt signed i think were more likely to have offered nearer 2 possibly with add ons but would be a cracking signing imo and i think he would get plenty of goals in the system we play
I thought we'd try for Blackman on loan if a permanent deal wasn't possible.
£2m with add ons wouldn't get Gallagher. I think he's one we'll be happy to pay a big fee for - the sort of signing we haven't really seen since.... Ched Evans in 2009.
enquiries to his then agent dad. so not sure whats happening now,but was told after he went abroad he was coming to us on loan,why i dont know dunt make sense to me. apparently his father wanted 15 grand a week for him,but pigs offered 5 and man u an everton were offering 10. his father hates the pigs board apparently na. he wouldnt say about the world cup player and didnt mention how much for gallagher. hes very excited about the possibility of the players were in for signing for us . is there any chelsea reserves in world cup.
how much do you think we would offer for gallagher then herbert ? one things certain if we do sign him for a fee the other striker were gonna bring in almost certain to be a loan not great with tipping but i wouldnt be suprised if its adam armstrong mind if we were to get those 2 in think it would be a great bit of business utb ftp
I'd estimate £3m with performance based add ons towards £5m.
You're right, any other strikers would almost certainly be loans. But in terms of attacking assets, we'd be in a good position with Gallagher and Brooks.
I think Newcastle will prefer to sell Armstrong. I'd be all for signing him and Gallagher permanently, expensive but worthwhile, a good joint punt.
isnt armstrong only 21 ? can see newcastle loaning him again and we could well be one of a few clubs in for him