QUOTE=BaggieBlood;38983444]Ignore the moron Al, it is abundantly clear that the majority shareholder (the c???) had 92% (along with his sister) of the shares and therefore he took at least 92% of the dividends.

I wouldn't be surprised if the shares in the company had different categories of shares giving differing voting and dividend rights.

He acquired the shares of fans who saved the club in its hour of need in the mid 90's by concocting one scheme after another to acquire them for the least amount of money.

Those 8% of shareholdeds who still have their shares stood firm to his bullying tactics and I doubt very much that they got 8% of the 27m dividend.

But, for the sake of clarity the c??? Took at least 92% of 27m.

It can be argued the money was moved there and here but, it cannot be argued who would take the dividend, THE SHAREHOLDER.[/QUOTE]

Ah, his henchman has arrived on the scene!

Question and Answer time, I think.

Q1 What was the name of the Company that paid these interim dividends during year ended 30/6/2016?

A1 West Bromwich Albion Football Club Ltd.

Q2 To whom was the payment made?

A2 To the Shareholders of the Company

Q3 Who were the Shares held by?

A3 There were two shares issued, both in the name of West Bromwich Albion Group Ltd.

Q4 Was Jeremy Peace a Director of this Company (WBA Group Ltd) ?

A4 He had been up until his resignation in 2013, so had no way of controlling the day to day running in 2016.

Q5 How could funds be taken from WBA Group Ltd?

A5 Either by salary payments to directors,subject to PAYE and NI, or by the Directors recommending a dividend to Shareholders.

Q6 Did the Directors of WBA Group Ltd recommend the payment of a dividend.

A6 No, so none of the Shareholders, either small or large holdings, received any payment

Do I need to go on?