I wouldn't agree that we were battered for75% of the game but as I've stated on another thread, we have real problems at the back. We were dreadful for the opening 15 minutes but felt then that we took control of the game. What I don't understand is why alter a system that puts you 4-1 up by taking off a striker, Gayle, and adopting a defensive attitude. Surely it's better to continue with an attacking approach that has put you three goals up in the first place. Is that too simplistic?