That is so confusing
I'll list the names each week of the winners in each match.
Brentford - Mattock (1)
Ipswich - Ajayi (5)
Leeds - Williams (1)
Hull - Manning (2)
Millwall - Ajayi(5)
Wigan - Manning(2)
Derby County = Ajayi (5)
Aston Villa = Vaulks (1)
Nottingham Forest = Jones (1)
Stoke City = Ajayi (5)
Birmingham City = Vassell (1)
Boro = Ajayi (5)
Preston NE = Smith (1)
Swansea City = Rodak (2)
Blackburn = Rodak (2)
Sheffield United = Taylor(1)
QPR = Vaulks (2)
Norwich City = Williams (2)
Sheffield Wednesday = Towell (2)
Reading = Rodak (3)
WBA = Robertson (1)
Preston N E = Rodak (4)
Man City
Ipswich Town = Wiles (1)
Leeds = Mattock (2)
Millwall = Crooks (1)
Hull
Sheffield Wednesday = Icky (1)
Reading = Ajayi (8)
Blackburn = Ajayi (8)
QPR = Ajayi (8)
Norwich = Wiles (2)
Derby = Newell (1)
Nottingham Forest = Smith (2)
Villa = Vaulks (3)
Stoke = Crooks (2)
Swansea = Crooks (3)
Birmingham = Crooks (4)
WBA = Robertson (2)
Table
Ajayi 8
Rodak 4
Crooks 4
Vaulks 3
Mattock 2
Manning 2
Williams 2
Towell 2
Taylor 1
Smith 2
Robertson 2
Wiles 2
Icky 1
Newell 1
Last edited by frogmiller; 30-04-2019 at 09:15 AM.
That is so confusing
I get that Frog, I’m not totally thick it just looks confusing when you’re looking at it
Lol Frog, it was the numbers that did it for me.
I’d set it out like this then if Manning scores against Derby it would be (3) but no big deal
Brentford - Mattock (1)
Ipswich - Ajayi (1)
Leeds - Williams (1)
Hull - Manning (1)
Millwall - Ajayi(2)
Wigan - Manning(2)
Not exactly frog.
e.g. against each "Ajayi" entry you have put "3" - the season total so far
MT has put "1" against his first mom game "2" against his second, "3" against his 3rd
Better? neither better nor worse imo.
I don't think the way you are doing it is confusing.