Fυck it. Wherever we are, on the day, it's the Aberdeen end ... and the other end is the other end .... most likely the cheek end. Call these ends what ye will, but here's a thought .... when we beat these fυckin scummy hun cυnts, we will nae doubt get the ither end next time .... Ah've only ever been tae two Hampden games, one at each end ... and have tae say, the so called proddie end was superior in terms o' comfort and atmosphere .... so ... if we want it? we can hae it .... we jist need tae win it
Cheers but I’ll pass. All of those pubs you mentioned will be rammed with Huns. It’s their traditional end. If we hadn’t bottled it, we might’ve had the end with the pubs but this is what happens when you want to see a strong Rangers. Enjoy your pre match pint.
They are only ever given one end, as are Celtic. They are the only two clubs afforded the special privilege. Is it any wonder they think they fu(kin own the place due to every other (unt in Scottish Football willingness to accept this ludicrous and sectarian situation.
I disagree with Mason about a lot of things, but he's bang on the money about this. We should have told the Scottish Football Authorities to get fu(ked long before now
As pointed out elsewhere by someone with a much better memory than me, Gordon Bennett was fighting for a 50/50 split 18 years ago. Yet here we are, releasing statements expressing disappointment
We need a firmer change of strategy
The words "Fighting to get a 50/50 split" should anger everyone in this room...
Sadly too many are happy to play along, hence 18 years later we still have the same issues.
As Mason says, let the back patting begin, great job on making a game that should be neutral still favour one team.
I guess we all measure success differently