Her being the Home Secretary told me what a hard nosed useless piece of sh!te she was, and always will be![]()
Her being the Home Secretary told me what a hard nosed useless piece of sh!te she was, and always will be![]()
You have made a very important point about a second referendum.
For me, I would have three choices on the ballot. Voters would have to choose their first and second preferences. If the winner of the first choices produced above 50% then this would win. Otherwise the least popular option is chucked out. The second count would include the second preference if a voters first choice had been chucked out and the winner would be the most popular choice.
"May's" deal - we will know the ins and outs of this.
Leave with no deal - I think people are informed enough on this.
Remain. And the point you made about, basically, "will it be business as usual?" needs clarification.
As far as I am aware, we can revoke Article 50 up to the leaving date of March 29th. So things should remain the same.
BUT...is it possible to arrange and vote on a new referendum before this date? I very much doubt it.
So our negotiators need to confirm our status if we choose to remain after 29th March. I don't think this is a difficult task - it should just be rubber-stamping the current arrangements - but it needs putting down in writing BEFORE any new referendum.
Some interesting thoughts here - if you can be bothered to read it all!
https://electionsetc.com/2018/11/21/...5bdd-312616881
I've read a lot of it 59, but eventually my head started spinning and I had to give up to it. Interesting read though, as far as I got.
On a potential second referendum, I believe the Electoral Commission has said it's too late to organise and hold one before the leaving date, and I think it could be problematic getting them to agree to three options on the ballot paper, although I could be wrong about that.
We've had this one several times before, but I still haven't seen any evidence that we can revoke or withdraw our application to leave under Article 50. What we can do is request an extension of the negotiating period, so we won't actually have left, but for this to happen all the other 27 EU countries have to agree to it. Justine Greening was at it today, saying parliament wouldn't vote for no deal, so it wouldn't happen. I'm not really sure that such a vote would make any difference, as it stands, according to Article 50, we leave on March 29th , either with a withdrawal agreement or without one. As far as I can tell, any other view is simply wishful thinking. The only other option is a possible extension of the negotiating period.