O/T The Worst PM In History

[stripes39]

This is the problem. One side says one thing, the other side says another. The only true fact is, as a nation we voted to leave. Get on with it and Remainers, stop moaning!

Shouldn’t that be Remoaners?

[WBA1955]

The worst PM in History was Blair. All the troubles with terrorism and refugees is all down to him for starting an illegal war. Blair knew exactly what he was doing whereas May hasn't a clue what she is doing.

Cameron was arrogant enough to put the vote on Europe to the people, believing they would vote remain. He hadn't forseen people voting out. He had no plan B, so he buggered off. Theresa was left to pick up the pieces. She then had the arrogance to call an election believing she would walk it. She nearly lost it and had to get the Ulster Unionists in to save her job.
It shows how out of touch MP's are with the general public.
Thatcher sold off most of our industry and businesses to foreign investors, which is why the suits want to remain in. You sow the seed and reap the harvest.
Whatever your political party we are in a right mess, and i cringe to see her grovelling to European leaders. We are a laughing stock.
I didn't like Thatcher, but she would have told them to shove it.

[westcountryvillain]

The leave vote was a vote for change as a result of years of austerity, not brought about by the EU. The UK govt. instead of accepting the result of the referendum from day 1, set about fashioning a deal very late in the day that pleases no-one, the delay being because of persistent squabbling and perhaps a naivety of thought that 27 vs 1 was anything other than a walkover.

I fear it's now a game of poker as we head towards no-deal, which European business leaders do not want and will drive the 27 back to the negotiating table; along with the backdrop of the tories doing all they can to cling onto power. I've never known the nation to be so divided as it is now, and all the talk of "civil" unrest is worrying to say the least.

[Leicesterbaggie]

The leave vote was a vote for change as a result of years of austerity, not brought about by the EU. The UK govt. instead of accepting the result of the referendum from day 1, set about fashioning a deal very late in the day that pleases no-one, the delay being because of persistent squabbling and perhaps a naivety of thought that 27 vs 1 was anything other than a walkover.

I fear it's now a game of poker as we head towards no-deal, which European business leaders do not want and will drive the 27 back to the negotiating table; along with the backdrop of the tories doing all they can to cling onto power. I've never known the nation to be so divided as it is now, and all the talk of "civil" unrest is worrying to say the least.

If there is a second referendum, without a doubt, there will be 'civil' unrest.

[talkSAFT]

If there is a second referendum, without a doubt, there will be 'civil' unrest.

where's my gilet jaune..........

[9goals2hattricks3pen]

I belong to a discussion group who meet once a month. Brexit has been on the agenda once or twice. Just been told we have a new member joining in January. He is the local Chairman of UKIP. Should be interesting.

[WBA123]

If there is a second referendum, without a doubt, there will be 'civil' unrest.

This should never be a reason not to hold a democratic vote.

[boingy]

This should never be a reason not to hold a democratic vote.

We had one remember? two days of the losers grumbling should have been sufficient. Only the EU and the remoaners want a re vote till they get the answer they want. We don't think like that. We respect the vote. I really have no time for this EU nonsense. This is my final comment. Say what you like, you have been for two years, why stop now.

[WBA123]

We had one remember? two days of the losers grumbling should have been sufficient. Only the EU and the remoaners want a re vote till they get the answer they want. We don't think like that. We respect the vote. I really have no time for this EU nonsense. This is my final comment. Say what you like, you have been for two years, why stop now.

Still waiting on you backing up that load of rubbish you posted earlier, with any source that is remotely newsworthy..

Until then, you have no credibility.

[Leicesterbaggie]

This should never be a reason not to hold a democratic vote.

We've had one, or I thought we had! What will happen, let's say if the remoaners won 51% to 49%? Oh I forgot, that will be OK because it was a democratic vote.