Loanees

[countygump]

I'm only guessing, but I would have thought any loan agreement would have to be ratified under Football League rules, stipulating length of loan, payment terms, recall options etc. It seems a bit weird if a change of manager could negate an agreement, seeing as a change of manager is a common thing especially with us and them.

I've a feeling that both Yates and Grants 'year long loan agreements' had a review clause in Jan. Whatever that means? Forest insisted they were well within their rights to recall both if they choose but Al said he had, had assurances that we would have them both for a full season?

https://www.nottinghampost.com/sport...-nolan-1012932

[Bohinen]

Jones was fine in Dads Army but when he started to try & play football, Oh Dear.

Godfrey would be better than the current lot.

[nw6pie]

The moral of the story, never trust a red back.

The moral of the story: The chairman should keep his opinions - even if valid - to himself. Leicester, F***** and Derby all produce good young players and we have to tap into that. We can’t afford to be criticising F***** publicly; we need their young players like Yates and Grant far more than they need to send them to us.

[legs77]

My opinion Forest did nothing wrong with Yates as it clearly wasn’t in the contract otherwise they wouldn’t have been able to just take him back.

Basic rule of thumb in any business is get it in writing with no clauses but that wasn’t the case and Hardy knows it that’s why he kicked off.

When are we going to give some of these kids we have given pro contracts to ? As what is the point if we don’t play them.