+ Visit Dundee FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 24 of 32 FirstFirst ... 142223242526 ... LastLast
Results 231 to 240 of 320

Thread: The DERRY

  1. #231
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    13,166
    Quote Originally Posted by BCram View Post
    but they aren't doing that now. We should be pleased that they have brought this matter to light and given the supporters an insight into what FPS are trying to achieve. The restrictions in the "sale" agreement to FPS were there for good reasons.
    they emailed their 200 members, they have no interest in involving anyone else

  2. #232
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    9,883
    Quote Originally Posted by Taintedice View Post
    they emailed their 200 members, they have no interest in involving anyone else
    So you think that they should let non members of the society have a say on the future of the society? And that after you tearing into the society and calling them for everything over the last few days?

    If it suits your purpose you want involvement, if it doesn't you want to snipe.

    You can't be taken seriously I'm afraid.

  3. #233
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    19,296
    Quote Originally Posted by Taintedice View Post
    they emailed their 200 members, they have no interest in involving anyone else
    They have just under 150 members.

    Around 3% of our regular support , probably less than 1% of those that see DFC as their team.

  4. #234
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    19,296
    My fear (It has been for a few months now) is that we move to tannadice and FPS bail out.

    It imho will be sold as a temporary arrangement but quickly become permanent.

  5. #235
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    9,779
    Quote Originally Posted by Deeranged View Post
    So you think that they should let non members of the society have a say on the future of the society? And that after you tearing into the society and calling them for everything over the last few days?

    If it suits your purpose you want involvement, if it doesn't you want to snipe.

    You can't be taken seriously I'm afraid.
    It’s not about the future of the society, it’s about the future of the club, these shares belong to every fan that donated during admin, not the few who donate a fiver per year to wannabe fans ownership group

  6. #236
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Taintedice View Post
    they emailed their 200 members, they have no interest in involving anyone else
    I think that they care very deeply about the club and that is why they sent the email. If you want to read it there's a post on the other forum from harry94. Have a look and see what others are saying. I think everyone is concerned about the implications and you can help the club by expressing your fears. I'm not at all sure what the motivations are for FPS. As hmac says earlier in this thread FPS have not said anything, and that's right, at least to my knowledge, and so all the comments about the future are speculation. Rross puts his worries forward, and he's not alone, in thinking that the way things are for FPS isn't working. Everything however is speculation so far and it will get worse until the the stadium is started. It's obviously a complex proposal and has not gone as quickly as hoped.

    I think that if you are not a member of DFCSS you should post your questions on forums and hope that the club will get the message and answer them. I think FPS have been very supportive and deserve praise for their investment in the playing staff. Success on the field has eluded them but they are still here backing the new manager. The last thing we need is a split between the supporters and the board IMO.

  7. #237
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by jdfc View Post
    It’s not about the future of the society, it’s about the future of the club, these shares belong to every fan that donated during admin, not the few who donate a fiver per year to wannabe fans ownership group
    You seem to me to misunderstand the situation. My understanding is that DFCSS do not want to get the club back under fan based ownership. We have been down that route and it did not work.

  8. #238
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    13,166
    Quote Originally Posted by Deeranged View Post
    So you think that they should let non members of the society have a say on the future of the society? And that after you tearing into the society and calling them for everything over the last few days?

    If it suits your purpose you want involvement, if it doesn't you want to snipe.

    You can't be taken seriously I'm afraid.
    After you getting it hopelessly wrong over DFCTV, where do you rank yourself? Keep arguing your case, though, don't get so rattled you start getting personal. Your first sentence really does sum up the mindset the club is dealing with, though. This is not about the future of the society, no-one cares about them, especially me. These shares belong to everyone who ever contributed, not just you and other DFCSSers who will always put themselves before the club.

    Attempting to justify 6 people, including Dave Forbes, making massive decisions about the CLUB, without any regard to the wider fanbase, I'm afraid DFCSS are no different to when they were forced out in 2013, regardless of your claims otherwise. And for clarity over your rant, up till now, all comments made about DFCSS were from 2011-2013, no clue what you're doing nowadays, apart from the obvious

  9. #239
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    13,166
    Quote Originally Posted by jdfc View Post
    It’s not about the future of the society, it’s about the future of the club, these shares belong to every fan that donated during admin, not the few who donate a fiver per year to wannabe fans ownership group
    Try getting Deeranged to see that, it's society over everything else, especially the club.

  10. #240
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    9,883
    Quote Originally Posted by jdfc View Post
    It’s not about the future of the society, it’s about the future of the club, these shares belong to every fan that donated during admin, not the few who donate a fiver per year to wannabe fans ownership group
    Wrong, they belong to the DFCSS which is a membership organisation. Each member of DFCSS has one share in the society.

    There's nothing else to discuss on this matter I'm afraid as them's the facts.

Page 24 of 32 FirstFirst ... 142223242526 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •