If you think it's acceptable to spend thousands of pounds on accountancy fees instead of good causes, that's great. Let's not forget, DFCSS are as tinpot as it gets, £6k income, 130 members, half that at the AGM, wake-up.
The Evening Telegraph reports that the 2 DFCSS directors were jeered. For your last sentence, reap as you sow. DFCSS have just taken the complete piss out of FPS over this shares thing, which should have been resolved 2 years ago.
The stadium project has been on the go for years, why don't DFCSS send a legal letter now, saying they won't interfere, are they expecting FPS to grovel to them? FPS will ignore them, rightly so. I doubt the manner in which DFCSS attained these protections will stand up in a court so no chance of them mounting a legal challenge to stop the project. Although wouldn't put it past them.
DFCSS offered to sell the A-shares to FPS first, that is documented in the club statement, which you can choose to ignore if you wish.
i think this is getting boring now, obviously you won't accept any criticism against them. Maybe you can change it up and tell me what's good about DFCSS, what they've done for the club and the local community? Shouldn't take long