Dfcss non members views for future,what would it take for you to pay your £5

[grantzer]

Am I being threatened with lawyers yet

Why would you think you should be?

[Taintedice]

Already have been. And the polis. Think I'll put you on ignore as well, dfcss'ers are just too pernicious for me.

[grantzer]

Already have been. And the polis. Think I'll put you on ignore as well, dfcss'ers are just too pernicious for me.

Aw no.please don't.....gutted like

[BCram]

This is why Dfcss'ers shouldn't post on this thread, they all just want to abuse people who want to discuss what's wrong with dfcss and how it can be improved. it just becomes tft although with 2 of them on ignore, I feel no compulsion to get personal like they do

Sorry Taintedice but this just isn't true. I don't pick on you, I try to help this thread by agreeing that DFCSS should find new ways to operate, and my reward is being told that I can't post on this thread. I genuinely thought that you were making a joke and if we had been on Pravda would have ticked a to show my appreciation. I don't think any of the people who I know as DFCSS members would disagree with you that DFCSS needs to do something more than just being the organisation that has a shareholding in DFC. I don't believe that changing the Board of DFCSS, who are all volunteers, will achieve anything at all. They have a position within the legal structures that surround our club based on actions and decisions taken in the past. This thread is in my opinion about trying to build bridges and work together, for a better future.

[Taintedice]

I was joking, censorship is not for me, unlike others. This is just a wee game to pass time as dfcss'ers really take this stuff personally which I find funny, although nothing I've said has ever been disproven since it all comes from dfcss documents. And you did refer to folk (like me) as 'malicious' on another thread once the greatest problem facing dfcss is the 2 leading directors who want a say in running the club even though they have no real right to expect anything as they have been hostile to fps since they first appeared in 2013. The tuck shop king had to be surgically removed from his blazer and will never forget that. Dfcss posturing over the new stadium is also incredulous as the protections were never designed for such an event but dfcss want to make it that way, expecting fps to go begging for permission. That isn't going to happen.

[BCram]

Explanation accepted. Also I apologise for inferring that you were malicious. Do you have a favourite pejorative adjective that you would like me to use to describe your posts?

[Deeranged]

Do you have a favourite pejorative adjective that you would like me to use to describe your posts?

I can think of some.

[Taintedice]

Explanation accepted. Also I apologise for inferring that you were malicious. Do you have a favourite pejorative adjective that you would like me to use to describe your posts?

my fav is 'antagonistic' which some dfcss'ers can't get enough of

[BCram]

I can think of some.

You keep out of this Deeranged, this is gentle banter,Which I know you can do, because your post is a perfect example!

[BCram]

my fav is 'antagonistic' which some dfcss'ers can't get enough of

OK, message received!