+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 98

Thread: tony stewart losing credability

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,193
    Might be jumping late into the discussion but IMO .............
    No Tony Stewart
    No Club, whatever the division

    Quite happy that my Grandson runs around his, Doncaster, back garden in his Millers shirt shouting Rotherham United !
    Last edited by BramleyMiller58; 20-04-2019 at 09:27 PM.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    4,366

    Sir Tony.......

    Quote Originally Posted by Brin View Post
    Sir?
    Yes.......I'm going to recommend him for an MBE to go alongside his OBE.....
    Then people can call him Sir if they so wish and show him some respect.

    M.B..E. -- Miller....By....Example.....

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    4,924
    People go on about TS promises but the fact of the matter is nothing is set in stone and you can’t get anywhere if you don’t aim high.

    It is possible for us to get in premiership but the structure and money needs to be there unfortunately the weak link at the moment is sir Stewart he needs to be more decisive and I’m not just talking about money

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    7,334
    Poor old TS. Just lost the love of his life and now all this ballax to contend with. If I were him I’d say frack this and ride off into the sunset.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    52,667
    Quote Originally Posted by sota View Post
    Poor old TS. Just lost the love of his life and now all this ballax to contend with. If I were him I’d say frack this and ride off into the sunset.
    Sota fella how’s things? There’s no good timing in life and like you say Tony’s loss of his beloved Wife and the season ending. They couldn’t have come at a worse joining.

    The main thing is, f.uck football when you’ve lost your soul mate like you say. He may well indeed want to walk away then again the involvement of owning a club may indeed spur him on, who knows?

    Who’d be a Chairman?

  6. #66
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    42,107
    In the past I have been critical of the way TS has said things that were unrealistic. I have also questioned some of the things that the club has done or not done when it comes to fulfilling promisses to the surrounding areas of New York Stadium. What's happening to the ownership of the ground when the loan is paid back and how that will effect the club.

    To think that TS is responsible for our plight this season is ridiculous. To think that any one person with a small club like Rotherham United could compete at this level on equal terms as other clubs with the fan base that we have isn't realistic.
    The amount of money that passes through the club anually is not enough and it is as simple as that. Maybe to expect someone to keep dipping into his pocket to try and shore up the club isn't correct but it is exactly what we have. TS and ADS conitue to shore up our club.

    Regardless of what we want there are basic laws of human nature that we have to take into account. Why would someone pump their hard earned cash to a community project like club is? TS isn't getting any financial reward for his effort! He had heard of Rotherham United but he had no intention of running the damn thing before the council approached him. Yet he is now a Miller through and through. His business skills and support by the council have been key to this. If the club had to buy the land that it is homed on it probably wouldn't be there now. It wouldn't support the burger van or any of the pubs, cafes, shopes or services that gain from Rotherham United being where they are and the supporters that spend their money there each home match. This is on the backdrop of all of the big chains that have left Rotherham to fend for itself.

    The can't really blame him for the recruitment of players when he has invested in the latest equipment for scouting players. There may have been a problem with the guy using the equipment the project was bought for.

    We can't blame him for the signing of players. He has set the budget for the playing staff and the club will work to that. This point of the critisism really needs to be understood and maybe someone with better accounting knowledge can put it in a simpler way.

    We can't buy players unless we sell a player or a player leaves.
    The money in the budget will stretch to a certain amount of players. The less players that we have the more we can pay them. The more players that we have the less we can pay them.
    To think that we could pay 10k per week on a player would mean that the with a £7m Championship budget we'd have a squad of 14.
    To think that that budget drops by say £3m that means that to keep the 14 players they need to take a pay cut to £5500 per week.

    We can all sit down and spend the clubs money but thankfully we are not allowed anywhere near it.

    The fault lies with the silly wages that the players demand and the EFL who are trying to get a grip of it through the Fair rules thing that the chairmen of all of the Champioship clubs get a vote on.
    I don't know haw much the parachute money is for relegated clubs from the Premiership but I don't think that it willl be far off that of our entire budget. Yet this money is supposed to level out the losses for the clubs that have been relegated. Instead of paying the players that they have already under contract this money is used to buy more players to try and gain promotion again. When that goes wrong they spend even more out and play in to emptier stadiums.

    This is not the fault of TS! This criticism has been aimed at him a few times now and it has to be said that some people just don't get the situation, don't want to understand the situation or are just talking bollax!

    We are having a good spell in a higher division that we are wanting to play at with players that have done well for their skill level. Can we ask for anything more knowing that the rules in place are to protect clubs from self harm and live within their means? Why would we not want a Rotherham United? It is clear that Tony Stewart wants a Rotherham United because he's running the club in a way that it will rest in the community of Rotherham for as long as he is at the helm.

    This man should not be criticised for running our club as he does. He should be praised for giving us another wonderful season of football and making sure that next season we'll be here having another go in what ever division we're in.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,141
    Frog.
    That is probably the most sensible post I have ever seen on here.
    Spot on pal.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    26,770
    Quote Originally Posted by frogmiller View Post
    In the past I have been critical of the way TS has said things that were unrealistic. I have also questioned some of the things that the club has done or not done when it comes to fulfilling promisses to the surrounding areas of New York Stadium. What's happening to the ownership of the ground when the loan is paid back and how that will effect the club.

    To think that TS is responsible for our plight this season is ridiculous. To think that any one person with a small club like Rotherham United could compete at this level on equal terms as other clubs with the fan base that we have isn't realistic.
    The amount of money that passes through the club anually is not enough and it is as simple as that. Maybe to expect someone to keep dipping into his pocket to try and shore up the club isn't correct but it is exactly what we have. TS and ADS conitue to shore up our club.

    Regardless of what we want there are basic laws of human nature that we have to take into account. Why would someone pump their hard earned cash to a community project like club is? TS isn't getting any financial reward for his effort! He had heard of Rotherham United but he had no intention of running the damn thing before the council approached him. Yet he is now a Miller through and through. His business skills and support by the council have been key to this. If the club had to buy the land that it is homed on it probably wouldn't be there now. It wouldn't support the burger van or any of the pubs, cafes, shopes or services that gain from Rotherham United being where they are and the supporters that spend their money there each home match. This is on the backdrop of all of the big chains that have left Rotherham to fend for itself.

    The can't really blame him for the recruitment of players when he has invested in the latest equipment for scouting players. There may have been a problem with the guy using the equipment the project was bought for.

    We can't blame him for the signing of players. He has set the budget for the playing staff and the club will work to that. This point of the critisism really needs to be understood and maybe someone with better accounting knowledge can put it in a simpler way.

    We can't buy players unless we sell a player or a player leaves.
    The money in the budget will stretch to a certain amount of players. The less players that we have the more we can pay them. The more players that we have the less we can pay them.
    To think that we could pay 10k per week on a player would mean that the with a £7m Championship budget we'd have a squad of 14.
    To think that that budget drops by say £3m that means that to keep the 14 players they need to take a pay cut to £5500 per week.

    We can all sit down and spend the clubs money but thankfully we are not allowed anywhere near it.

    The fault lies with the silly wages that the players demand and the EFL who are trying to get a grip of it through the Fair rules thing that the chairmen of all of the Champioship clubs get a vote on.
    I don't know haw much the parachute money is for relegated clubs from the Premiership but I don't think that it willl be far off that of our entire budget. Yet this money is supposed to level out the losses for the clubs that have been relegated. Instead of paying the players that they have already under contract this money is used to buy more players to try and gain promotion again. When that goes wrong they spend even more out and play in to emptier stadiums.

    This is not the fault of TS! This criticism has been aimed at him a few times now and it has to be said that some people just don't get the situation, don't want to understand the situation or are just talking bollax!

    We are having a good spell in a higher division that we are wanting to play at with players that have done well for their skill level. Can we ask for anything more knowing that the rules in place are to protect clubs from self harm and live within their means? Why would we not want a Rotherham United? It is clear that Tony Stewart wants a Rotherham United because he's running the club in a way that it will rest in the community of Rotherham for as long as he is at the helm.

    This man should not be criticised for running our club as he does. He should be praised for giving us another wonderful season of football and making sure that next season we'll be here having another go in what ever division we're in.
    Nailed it , great post .

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    26,770
    As a non emotive contributor to all things RUFC on this board my personal opinion is that TS is one of the best owners to have graced any boardroom in this country .

    From where he started with this project in league two at an athletics stadium in Sheffield through to three promotions , a brand new stadium and championship football is testament to what he's given to the town of Rotherham .

    I've criticised my own clubs former owner sadly departed who is seen as some kind of messiah over our way .

    He wasn't in the same league as TS , the man made a substantial profit on his investment and his family still retains 20% .

    To put in comparable terms RUFC would have to pay TS back around £40m should he walk away from the club , that's my best guessestimate mind .

    It's unlikely TS will see much profit on his investment or even get his money back in full .

    He's given far more out than he will get back and that's the measure of the man .

    I'd take TS as my clubs owner any day of the week over Patrick Cryne and a consortium of billionaires from overseas .

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    9,341
    Hear hear Frogster. Top post.

Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •