Net spend

[ghostrider]

You again fail to take in another's points.

I take in any points but whether I agree with them or not is down to whether I think the points present a valid argument for fact.
They don't generally and this is why I counter argue by putting my points across which are equally only my points of view and not necessarily fact.
It comes down to who has the facts or who believes they hold the higher ground if they don't have the facts.

Not as cut and dried as it appears when arguing points about the club and the custodians of it....etc.